| To: | "Andi Kleen" <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [xfs-masters] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings |
| From: | "Dave Airlie" <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 21 Oct 2007 22:17:45 +1000 |
| Cc: | "Nick Piggin" <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David Chinner" <dgc@xxxxxxx>, "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Mark Williamson" <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Morten Bøgeskov" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=RqDAJp+/DXYvTC8MBj491W3J0T16ImEt/rmH2lQJONI=; b=g5fxl2bzw3+GC1NFIV+r+sKrx/FTFu+wSF84TFx9VP7yM4+JokpNFIQoh2CtzcKNI4XIOWLrFDmgcbTbBHtiQiBKPb89makIwn2lOfnPnkKrigqu4W3FtYXOVQXLJg6FhhK7+9zrwkMiqLBh7Z0rtSqNKRLAQofG2ndhugSHU9U= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NekCUqIg6+VSzoWhajB2uoReH63cqrEfkfxVq17yG2uZj4v8FqRDyIEcxRbWZg/VEnWf03y/x644rRmq+nVUCcPiw33ArAkm7OQ3atQ2UYIm5a7B6IJXOjpKj0zAV79ZUs9bCeeNChjTjuEMvtycjh5K9r9+srqhI2CyjlrEHv8= |
| In-reply-to: | <20071015125407.GA13329@one.firstfloor.org> |
| References: | <470FA7C3.90404@goop.org> <200710160056.47458.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <20071015110735.GA11748@one.firstfloor.org> <200710152128.10900.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <20071015125407.GA13329@one.firstfloor.org> |
| Reply-to: | xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 10/15/07, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hmm, OK. It looks like DRM vmallocs memory (which gives highmem). > > I meant I'm not sure if it uses that memory uncached. I admit > not quite understanding that code. There used to be at least > one place where it set UC for an user mapping though. Currently the only DRM memory handed to userspace is vmalloc_32 in drm_scatter.c I notice the VIA driver does its own vmalloc for dmablit, so it may have an issue with this if highmem is involved. This will change with the upcoming memory manager so I'll need to investigate it a bit perhaps... Dave. |
| Previous by Date: | (no subject), Niv Sardi-Altivanik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [xfs-masters] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Benjamin Herrenschmidt |
| Previous by Thread: | [xfs-masters] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | [xfs-masters] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Benjamin Herrenschmidt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |