| To: | Mitsuo Hayasaka <mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH -v2 1/3] xfs: change available ranges of softlimit and hardlimit in quota check |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:32:19 -0500 |
| Cc: | Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>, Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, yrl.pp-manager.tt@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20120206125007.12624.58454.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20120206124951.12624.88233.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120206125007.12624.58454.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 09:50:07PM +0900, Mitsuo Hayasaka wrote: > In general, quota allows us to use disk blocks and inodes up to each > limit, that is, they are available if they don't exceed their limitations. > Current xfs sets their available ranges to lower than them except disk > inode quota check. So, this patch changes the ranges to not beyond them. Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] XFS; xfs_trans_add_item() - don't assign in ASSERT() when compare is intended, Ben Myers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH -v2 2/3] xfs: make inode quota check more general, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH -v2 1/3] xfs: change available ranges of softlimit and hardlimit in quota check, Mitsuo Hayasaka |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH -v2 2/3] xfs: make inode quota check more general, Mitsuo Hayasaka |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |