| To: | Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs deadlock in stable kernel 3.0.4 |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 12 Sep 2011 16:05:43 -0400 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <C6515E45-5724-43DD-95A8-1F89AFE29601@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1D2B34A7-7BB9-4E4E-9CA2-382C210E125F@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110912152133.GA8345@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C6515E45-5724-43DD-95A8-1F89AFE29601@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 06:46:26PM +0200, Stefan Priebe wrote: > > What kind of workload are you running? Also did the workload run fine > > with an older kernel, and if yes which one? > > Mysql, Web, Mail, ftp ;-) yes it was with 2.6.32. I upgraded from that > version. Just curious, is this the same system that also shows the freezes reported to the scsi list? If I/Os don't get completed by lower layers I can see how we get everything in XFS waiting on the log reservations, given that we never get the log tail pushed. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs deadlock in stable kernel 3.0.4, Stefan Priebe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs deadlock in stable kernel 3.0.4, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs deadlock in stable kernel 3.0.4, Stefan Priebe |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs deadlock in stable kernel 3.0.4, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |