| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS internal error (memory corruption) |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 6 Jul 2011 04:05:05 -0400 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, T?r?k Edwin <edwintorok@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20110706072221.GZ1026@dastard> |
| References: | <4E12A927.9020102@xxxxxxxxx> <20110705130932.GF1026@dastard> <4E1313C1.6020309@xxxxxxxxx> <20110706040403.GW1026@dastard> <20110706070756.GA25800@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110706072221.GZ1026@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:22:21PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > Unless you have a good sized chunk of BBWC in front of your disks, > in which case internal logs are just as fast. In fact, internal logs > can are often faster in this case because an internal log on a 12 > disk RAID6 array can sink a whole log more bandwidth than an external > log on a 2-disk RAID0 mirror..... > > At least, that's what my hardware tells me. ;) Sure, a nice BBWC setup will give you good results. But it's generally much more expensive than a simple setup with a raid5 or 6 and a mirror for the log device. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS internal error (memory corruption), Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Bug 909] New: XFS internal error xfs_bmap_read_extents(), bugzilla-daemon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS internal error (memory corruption), Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | [Bug 909] New: XFS internal error xfs_bmap_read_extents(), bugzilla-daemon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |