| To: | Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [xfs-masters] 2.6.29-rc: kernel BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:108 |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 24 Jan 2009 04:22:10 +0100 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-testers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <a4423d670901231034k6971ed91tbed3d6eab05d7285@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20090110152803.GA7469@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090110221459.GA8873@orion> <20090111104659.GB8071@disturbed> <a4423d670901111648w26e86baajcf7b6d98ff37d043@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090112034550.GI8071@disturbed> <a4423d670901120008j728af9cdrbed8bbb938117ea3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090112211848.GL8071@disturbed> <a4423d670901201054t3e48ece2ned4a7e3254250fce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090120203319.GA7103@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <a4423d670901231034k6971ed91tbed3d6eab05d7285@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 09:34:36PM +0300, Alexander Beregalov wrote: > But I do not need LBD. Does XFS strongly require LBD? > Should I always turn it on even if I do not have files or devices of size > 2Tb+ ? The bug is now fixed in the development tree, but until you upgrade to a kernel with the fix enabling CONFIG_LBD will keep you from hitting the bug. As you unfortunately noticed the !CONFIG_LBD case doesn't really get much test coverage, so I would personally recommend turning it on even if you don't need it. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [xfs-masters] no more ptools -> oss.sgi.com, Russell Cattelan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Bug 813] logsize parsing in xfs_mkfs is broken for small blocksizes, bugzilla-daemon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [xfs-masters] 2.6.29-rc: kernel BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:108, Alexander Beregalov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [xfs-masters] 2.6.29-rc: kernel BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:108, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |