| To: | Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: Fix f_flags races without the BKL |
| From: | Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 2 Jan 2009 20:09:03 +0100 |
| Cc: | Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20090102184232.GH28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> |
| References: | <20081229041352.6bbdf57c@tpl> <20090102184232.GH28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On 01/02, Al Viro wrote: > > Bloating with mutex is over the top, indeed, but why can't we simply keep > a pointer to fasync_struct in there? Do we ever have a struct file with > several fasync_struct? pipe_rdwr_fasync() ? Oleg. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: Fix f_flags races without the BKL, Al Viro |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: Fix f_flags races without the BKL, Al Viro |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: Fix f_flags races without the BKL, Al Viro |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: Fix f_flags races without the BKL, Al Viro |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |