xfs-masters
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RFC: Fix f_flags races without the BKL

To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RFC: Fix f_flags races without the BKL
From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:27:32 +0100
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20081229124151.GA29634@redhat.com>
References: <20081229041352.6bbdf57c@tpl> <20081229124151.GA29634@redhat.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 01:41:51PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 12/29, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> >
> > After pondering for a while, I couldn't come up with anything better than a
> > global file->f_flags mutex.  There's no point in bloating struct file with
> > a mutex just for this purpose; it's hard to imagine that there will be any
> > real contention for this lock.
> 
> Yes, this patch is simple and straightforward, but now we can't change
> ->f_flags in non-preempible context. And the global lock is not very
> nice anyway.
> 
> Once again, can't we use O_LOCK_FLAGS bit? I agree, it is a bit ugly,
> and I won't insist if you don't like is.

I would prefer O_LOCK_FLAGS bit too. The global lock is not very nice
and I don't doubt someone will come up with a workload which
pounds on it.

-Andi
-- 
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>