xfs-masters
[Top] [All Lists]

[xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: arm allmodconfig

To: xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: arm allmodconfig
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:07:32 +1100
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Moore <paul.moore@xxxxxx>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20081029082459.GA6364@elte.hu>
Mail-followup-to: xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Moore <paul.moore@xxxxxx>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20081028175604.81c31cea.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081029074032.GI4985@disturbed> <20081029082459.GA6364@elte.hu>
Reply-to: xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 09:24:59AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > > fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c: In function `xfs_growfs_rt':
> > > > fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c:1875: warning: 'tp' might be used uninitialized in 
> > > > this function
> > 
> > False positive, and I don't get this reported, either.
> > 
> > Hold on - the above gcc binary only emits a warning for the 
> > xfs_growfs_rt issue when CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y is set. It 
> > still doesn't catch the quota bug, though. This is so fucked up....
> 
> FYI, i've got 3 XFS warnings mapped in tip/auto-warnings-next:
> 
>  earth4:~/tip> gll linus..auto-warnings-next | grep xfs
> 
>  ec2f37c: work around warning in fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c

Can't say I've ever seen that warning. What gcc version is
generating it?

>  8501db3: work around warning in fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c

Yeah, that's bogus.

>  8077af8: warnings: fix xfs posix acl

Should be fixed in the -next tree.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>