xfs-masters
[Top] [All Lists]

[xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: arm allmodconfig

To: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: arm allmodconfig
From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:53:02 -0400
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20081028175604.81c31cea.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard
References: <20081028175604.81c31cea.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reply-to: xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.10
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 8:56:04 pm Andrew Morton wrote:
> > net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c: In function `netlbl_mgmt_listentry':
> > net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c:268: warning: 'ret_val' might be used
> > uninitialized in this function
>
> Assumes that netlbl_af4list_foreach_rcu() will never iterate zero
> times.
>
> Assumes that entry->type can never have an unexpected value.
>
> gcc cannot get this right, and C-level changes will be needed to shut
> this up.

No idea why this didn't come up when I was compiling this ... oh well, 
good thing I'm not a proud guy :)  I'll get this fixed and post a patch 
later today.

Thanks.

-- 
paul moore
linux @ hp


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>