| To: | Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [xfs-masters] Re: freeze vs freezer |
| From: | Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:16:01 +0200 |
| Cc: | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <8B00F353-983F-40E7-931B-EA73CCD32F0A@mac.com> |
| References: | <4744FD87.7010301@goop.org> <200711262253.35420.rjw@sisk.pl> <20071127053846.GA28884@srcf.ucam.org> <200711271840.24825.rjw@sisk.pl> <8B00F353-983F-40E7-931B-EA73CCD32F0A@mac.com> |
| Reply-to: | xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
Hi!
(replying to *very* old mail).
>>>> We wait until they can continue.
>>>
>>> So if I have a process blocked on an unavilable NFS mount, I can't
>>> suspend?
>>
>> That's correct, you can't.
>>
>> [And I know what you're going to say. ;-)]
>
> Why exactly does suspend/hibernation depend on "TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE" instead
> of a zero preempt_count()? Really what we should do is just iterate over
> all of the actual physical devices and tell each one "Block new IO requests
> preemptably, finish pending DMA, put the hardware in low-power mode, and
> prepare for suspend/hibernate". As long as each driver knows how to do
> those simple things we can have an entirely consistent kernel image for
> both suspend and for hibernation.
Patch would be welcome, actually. It turns out blocking new
IO-requests is not completely trivial.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [xfs-masters] Re: XFS internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1163 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c, Konstantin Kletschke |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [xfs-masters] Re: XFS internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1163 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c, Konstantin Kletschke |
| Previous by Thread: | [xfs-masters] [Bug 784] New: Kernel BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:57, bugzilla-daemon |
| Next by Thread: | [xfs-masters] Re: freeze vs freezer, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |