| To: | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: vfs merge failure |
| From: | Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 26 Mar 2008 05:23:35 +0000 |
| Cc: | Dave Hansen <haveblue@xxxxxxxxxx>, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20080326160651.7c1b10ae.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
| References: | <20080326160651.7c1b10ae.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
| Reply-to: | xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 04:06:51PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Al, Dave,
>
> In merging your vfs tree today, I get a conflict between commit
> 9e57c9b50551a21e056fea654b3aac5db7c33ec9 ("[PATCH] r/o bind mounts:
> elevate write count for ioctls()") and commit
> c657925dc0057ed2ec0db845a1a4f56651adfe39 ("[XFS] The forward declarations
> for the xfs_ioctl() helpers and the") in the xfs tree. Basically the
> whole xfs_ioctl function has been moved by the latter commit while Dave's
> patch modifies it slightly.
>
> I have fixed it up for today and am not really sure what we can do about
> it (hopefully git-rerere will fix it for me from now on, so I can carry
> it, but it will conflict when merged into Linus' tree).
*shrug*
I'll probably cherry-pick XFS changeset in question, if it's self-contained
enough, and put it in front of ro-bind series. Ought to resolve the
conflict and I have no hestitation about reordering/rebasing.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [xfs-masters] linux-next: vfs merge failure, Stephen Rothwell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: vfs merge failure, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | [xfs-masters] linux-next: vfs merge failure, Stephen Rothwell |
| Next by Thread: | [xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: vfs merge failure, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |