xfs-masters
[Top] [All Lists]

[xfs-masters] [Bug 721] sys-fs/xfsprogs-2.8.10 breaks fsck behavior as f

To: xfs-master@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [xfs-masters] [Bug 721] sys-fs/xfsprogs-2.8.10 breaks fsck behavior as fsck.xfs is broken
From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 21:40:59 -0700
Reply-to: xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=721





------- Additional Comments From tes@xxxxxxx  2006-10-02 21:40 CST -------
Torsten,
You confused me with the bit about being fine in xfsprogs 2.7.11 and broken now.
What you were referring to was:
xfsprogs-2.7.13 (08 February 2006)
        - Convert fsck into a shell script and make it provide a
          hint to run repair/check (in non-auto fsck modes).
          Thanks to Marian Jancar <mjancar@xxxxxxx> for this.
I take it that you were thinking that prior to 2.7.13 we were calling xfs_check 
(??)
since we didn't print out this message - when, in fact, AFAIK we never did.

I see your point, but like Russell said, it is too slow.
(Certainly slow for really large filesystems)
And that was one of the motivations of journalled filesystems AFAIK (that
fsck on boot wasn't paramount).
I guess there are different kinds of corruption.
The typical ones of missing metadata due to unclean unmounts (e.g. power 
failure)
are handled by the metadata log and its replay.
The (hopefully) less typical ones of software bugs and hardware failures etc..
will come apparent with log messages, filesystem shutdown, syscall failures and 
if you run
check/repair.

--Tim

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>