xfs-masters
[Top] [All Lists]

[xfs-masters] Re: [2.6 patch] let 4KSTACKS depend on EXPERIMENTAL and XF

To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [xfs-masters] Re: [2.6 patch] let 4KSTACKS depend on EXPERIMENTAL and XFS on 4KSTACKS=n
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:46:52 +0200
Cc: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, "Jeffrey E. Hundstad" <jeffrey.hundstad@xxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, Cahya Wirawan <cwirawan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040729114219.GN2349@fs.tum.de>
Organization: Red Hat UK
References: <20040720114418.GH21918@email.archlab.tuwien.ac.at> <40FD0A61.1040503@xfs.org> <40FD2E99.20707@mnsu.edu> <20040720195012.GN14733@fs.tum.de> <20040729060900.GA1946@frodo> <20040729114219.GN2349@fs.tum.de>
Reply-to: xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Mark this combination as BROKEN until XFS is fixed.
> > 
> > This part is not useful.  We want to hear about problems
> > that people hit with 4K stacks so we can try to address
> > them, and it mostly works as is.
> 
> 2.6 is a stable kernel series used in production environments.
> 
> Regarding Linus' tree, it's IMHO the best solution to work around it 
> this way until all issues are sorted out.
> 
> Feel free to revert it in -mm later, since there are many brave souls  
> running -mm you'll still get to hear about problems.

can you then also mark XFS broken in 2.4 entirely?
2.4 has a nett stack of also 4Kb... 

-- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --
-- File: signature.asc
-- Desc: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBBCOOrxULwo51rQBIRAhc4AJ9Jp+/ePsNufUxqo5ymgIAu1yufegCfRuLY
jLyLMBfI7nJcjMBZQf4ivaY=
=eahr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>