| To: | Ragnar Kjørstad <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: When LVM-0.9.1beta7 will be merged to XFS cvs tree? |
| From: | "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 05 Jul 2001 19:47:10 -0400 |
| Cc: | "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20010706011325.H28075@vestdata.no> |
| Organization: | Linuxcare, Inc. |
| References: | <20010705151357.A2773@dfbbb.cn.mvd> <3B4417D5.ECDC1125@god.bel.alcatel.be> <20010705101747.A32674@gruyere.muc.suse.de> <20010705234137.E28075@vestdata.no> <20010705234532.A16619@gruyere.muc.suse.de> <20010706011325.H28075@vestdata.no> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Copyleft) |
>>>>> "Ragnar" == rstad <Ragnar> writes: Ragnar> Now I'm confused. If the fix is in the XFS tree, why is it not Ragnar> in the XFS-patch? was the fix just commited? Fang Han had upgraded to LVM beta7, and the LVM patch procedure backs out our changes. -- Martin K. Petersen, Principal Linux Consultant, Linuxcare, Inc. mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.linuxcare.com/ SGI XFS for Linux Developer, http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: scsi module sym53c8xx fails on 1.0.1 PR3, Martin K. Petersen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: minor typo in PR3, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: When LVM-0.9.1beta7 will be merged to XFS cvs tree?, Ragnar Kjørstad |
| Next by Thread: | Re: When LVM-0.9.1beta7 will be merged to XFS cvs tree?, Martin K. Petersen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |