| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: What are the correct mkfs.xfs parameters for a lying WD-EARS HDD? |
| From: | "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:55:55 -0500 |
| Cc: | Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4B957E03.9090000@xxxxxxxxxxx> (Eric Sandeen's message of "Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:45:23 -0600") |
| Organization: | Oracle |
| References: | <20100308221044.GA17830@xxxxxxx> <4B957E03.9090000@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Eric> Make sure your partitions, if any, are on 4k boundaries.(*) older Eric> fdisk at least won't do this by default, not sure about parted. You can use the expert mode in fdisk to ensure that the partition begins on a 4KB boundary. Eric> (*)unless the drive has an offset to make 512-sector 63 line up on Eric> a nice boundary... in which case I guess you could experiment with Eric> perf both ways to be sure... EARS is the one that's lying about the physical block size. It's zero-aligned unless somebody messed with the jumper. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: What are the correct mkfs.xfs parameters for a lying WD-EARS HDD?, Matthias Schniedermeyer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: What are the correct mkfs.xfs parameters for a lying WD-EARS HDD?, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: What are the correct mkfs.xfs parameters for a lying WD-EARS HDD?, Gim Leong Chin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: What are the correct mkfs.xfs parameters for a lying WD-EARS HDD?, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |