| To: | dcox@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS and RAID5 Aren't Playing Well Together (more info) |
| From: | "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 18 Jan 2001 16:32:17 -0500 |
| Cc: | Linux-XFS <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3A675568.3821DE7D@mindspring.com> |
| Organization: | Linuxcare, Inc. |
| References: | <3A675568.3821DE7D@mindspring.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Canyonlands) |
>>>>> "Danny" == Danny <danscox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Danny> Now my main question: why does XFS change the block size? Because some of our writes operate on smaller entities than the fs block size. Danny> Also, when I attempt the mkfs.xfs, md reports: "mkfs.xfs(pid Danny> 527) used obsolete MD ioctl, upgrade your software to use new Danny> ictls." Is this an attempt by mkfs.xfs to change the Danny> blocksize? Yep. My bug. It seems I never committed the BLKSETSIZE ioctl changes to md. Will run some tests before updating the tree... -- Martin K. Petersen, Principal Linux Consultant, Linuxcare, Inc. mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.linuxcare.com/ Linuxcare. Moving Forward. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Can't get initial console, utz lehmann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - allow deactivation of delalloc pages, Ananth Ananthanarayanan |
| Previous by Thread: | XFS and RAID5 Aren't Playing Well Together (more info), Danny |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE - allow deactivation of delalloc pages, Ananth Ananthanarayanan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |