Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Moreover, we're going to do the full badblocks lookup anyway when we
>>> call ->direct_access(). If we had that information earlier we can
>>> avoid this fallback dance.
>>
>> None of the proposed approaches looks clean to me. I'll go along with
>> whatever you guys think is best. I am in favor of wrapping up all that
>> duplicated code, though.
>
> Christoph originally pushed for open coding this fallback decision
> per-filesystem. I agree with you on the "none the above" options are
> clean.
I don't recall him saying "open code". Rather, the sentiment was to
leave the fallback to the callers. That doesn't mean you can't wrap it
up in a convenience function.
Cheers,
Jeff
|