| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS PRE 0.10. and REDHAT 7.1 and 7.0 |
| From: | "Dave Sill" <de5-dated-2d76f6486a0d75a6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 25 Apr 2001 14:21:22 -0400 |
| In-reply-to: | Russell Cattelan's message of "Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:05:57 -0400" |
| Mail-followup-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <ED27E37B9488D211B2170004ACE83F630136BE4A@bos-amsa003e--n.boston.sgi.com> <3AE51CD1.4AA8943B@thebarn.com> <wx0d7a099by.fsf@sws5.ctd.ornl.gov> <3AE71204.BB775ECB@thebarn.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) |
Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > The XFS iso has a modified BOOT kernel (one capable of mounting XFS > filesystems) > and a modified installer on capable of creating XFS filesystems. > All rpms except the kernel and a few utilities are retrieved from the RH > 7.1 discs. OK, one more question--probably stupid, but I need to be sure. Will the kernel installed by such an installation include XFS, SGI partition, and SMP support, even if I don't create an XFS filesystem during the installation? And just for planning purposes...should I schedule a 7.1 pre 1.0 XFS installation within the week, or will I end up wishing I'd waited a couple days for 1.0 release? -Dave |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS PRE 0.10. and REDHAT 7.1 and 7.0, Russell Cattelan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS PRE 0.10. and REDHAT 7.1 and 7.0, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS PRE 0.10. and REDHAT 7.1 and 7.0, Russell Cattelan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS PRE 0.10. and REDHAT 7.1 and 7.0, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |