On Fri, 08 Jun 2001 16:01:26 -0400 (EDT)
John Trostel <jtrostel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I don't think this is an XFS problem. I wouldn't be
> suprised if it was a Samba
> problem.
think so, too.
> Why are you using TNG for PDC and HEAD for the
> file server, when
> SAMBA_2_2 could run both functions for you?
we are using tng as pdc because we need to use ldap as
authentication backend. as far as i know samba 2.2.0 can't
do that. in the mailing list it was just said that its on
the todo list and not to be implemented till
september/october. the tng is running very well, but is imho
not usable for fileserving. we did quite some testing on
this. thats why we decided to run a dual samba system like
this. it's running without any problems for quite a while
now.
> I would try using SAMBA_2_2 (CVS from yesterday or today)
> as both the file and
> PDC server and see if the problems go away. Then you
> would know that it was a
> problem strictly of using TNG and/or HEAD versions of
> Samba.
we'll probably try this next week, but we want to stick with
the ldap solution for now. hope tng is not the reason.
-------------------------------
itCampus Software- und Systemhaus GmbH
Leipzig - Halle - Wittenberg
http://www.itcampus.de
""
Description: Text document
""
Description: Text document
""
Description: Text document
|