| To: | "Eric Sandeen" <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: du result is smaller than xfs_quota report |
| From: | "YeYin" <eyniy@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:37:04 +0800 |
| Cc: | "xfs" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qq.com; s=s201307; t=1445409426; bh=op7NtXfY8UHs5lNPhMtFAzNNRwMlwgiMZXUIRYUTSW8=; h=In-Reply-To:References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:Message-ID; b=cVpFfzHJhxCrnLgPTWOAdkbRYB8aBZE5fxe2iezcI8RSzAmT10htNUOetT4coM1xN 16f+O42JWMdy9SBP4YFvEWUuItM7EkAMaIRriLJiyYhfAx9Y09YdO2kKqjkL9Iqaeu vbmPwRJs0++jrOfh+R59nIBHrz2eZTzXD5rTRQ4w= |
| In-reply-to: | <0952A0E9-F360-46CE-BE7A-1B8473700F08@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <tencent_7585C3B40C484DE23B248E82@xxxxxx> <0952A0E9-F360-46CE-BE7A-1B8473700F08@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
> Is anything mounted under that directory hierarchy, and hiding files from du's view? No, Thanks. I found some unlinked inodes, but I can't get some useful information: # xfs_db -xr -c 'agi 1' -c p /dev/sda4 magicnum = 0x58414749 versionnum = 1 seqno = 1 length = 89150592 count = 9472 root = 3 level = 1 freecount = 1902 newino = 997952 dirino = null unlinked[0-63] = 0:78272 1:98561 2:98562 3:78275 4:77060 5:78277 6:77062 7:78279 8:98568 9:98569 10:98570 11:77067 12:77068 13:98573 14:98574 15:78287 16:98576 17:98577 18:78290 19:98515 20:98068 21:78165 22:78294 23:78295 24:78168 25:888985 26:78170 27:98075 28:78172 29:78301 30:78302 31:98079 32:888992 33:76129 34:98082 35:76131 36:98084 37:98277 38:98278 39:910503 40:98280 41:98281 42:98282 43:98091 44:98092 45:98541 46:98094 47:98095 48:76976 49:75953 50:75954 51:98547 52:98484 53:98485 54:98550 55:98551 56:98488 57:98489 58:98106 59:98491 60:98492 61:889021 62:98558 63:98495 # xfs_db -xr -c 'inode 78272' -c p /dev/sda4 core.magic = 0 core.mode = 0 core.version = 0 core.format = 0 (dev) core.uid = 0 core.gid = 0 core.flushiter = 0 core.atime.sec = Thu Jan 1 08:00:00 1970 core.atime.nsec = 000000000 core.mtime.sec = Thu Jan 1 08:00:00 1970 core.mtime.nsec = 000000000 core.ctime.sec = Thu Jan 1 08:00:00 1970 core.ctime.nsec = 000000000 core.size = 0 core.nblocks = 0 core.extsize = 0 core.nextents = 0 core.naextents = 0 core.forkoff = 0 core.aformat = 0 (dev) core.dmevmask = 0 core.dmstate = 0 core.newrtbm = 0 core.prealloc = 0 core.realtime = 0 core.immutable = 0 core.append = 0 core.sync = 0 core.noatime = 0 core.nodump = 0 core.rtinherit = 0 core.projinherit = 0 core.nosymlinks = 0 core.extsz = 0 core.extszinherit = 0 core.nodefrag = 0 core.filestream = 0 core.gen = 0 next_unlinked = 0 u.dev = 0 Thanks, Ye ------------------ Original ------------------ From: "Eric Sandeen";<sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, Oct 21, 2015 03:35 AM To: "YeYin"<eyniy@xxxxxx>; Cc: "xfs"<xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Subject: Re: du result is smaller than xfs_quota report > On Oct 20, 2015, at 4:09 AM, YeYin <eyniy@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, all, > I encountered some problems when I used XFS with project quota: > > # cat /etc/projid > docker-15091421396426:65061 > docker-15092311522409:26286 > docker-15101215637294:14162 > > # cat /etc/projects > 65061:/data/docker-volumes/docker-15091421396426 > 26286:/data/docker-volumes/docker-15092311522409 > 14162:/data/docker-volumes/docker-15101215637294 > > # xfs_quota -xc 'report -h' /data > Project quota on /data (/dev/sda4) > Blocks > Project ID Used Soft Hard Warn/Grace > ---------- --------------------------------- > docker-15091421396426 1.0G 0 100G 00 [------] > docker-15092311522409 371.5G 0 700G 00 [------] > docker-15101215637294 920.8M 0 400G 00 [------] > > # du -sh /data/docker-volumes/docker-15092311522409 > 200G /data/docker-volumes/docker-15092311522409 > > As we can see, du's result(200G) is smaller than xfs_quota report. > Is anything mounted under that directory hierarchy, and hiding files from du's view? Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] xfs: optimise away log forces on timestamp updates for fdatasync, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: du result is smaller than xfs_quota report, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: du result is smaller than xfs_quota report, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: du result is smaller than xfs_quota report, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |