| To: | "Dave Chinner" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: du result is smaller than xfs_quota report |
| From: | "YeYin" <eyniy@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:09:20 +0800 |
| Cc: | "Eric Sandeen" <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qq.com; s=s201307; t=1445414963; bh=s7lillCd24R1Cg6icaG9YFPqCeRYjpeBzRp6kPVAtD8=; h=In-Reply-To:References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:Message-ID; b=gIla4/ZhDbz2P4EcMAAEntbAhnNDj5U7FLqWcZLF1aFqBA60eyrIHEklMmQHsTrwE aVnocv/PcoEVLhKqeIpUwJA3UPI5EDO0tlKCwSax6fEgb0ZqAFdlv/JHs+4grn/tU6 Twl1oXTtviHCAcQOfl3mpghnLYNy1FJwoDRPwniQ= |
| In-reply-to: | <20151021071331.GD19199@dastard> |
| References: | <tencent_7585C3B40C484DE23B248E82@xxxxxx> <0952A0E9-F360-46CE-BE7A-1B8473700F08@xxxxxxxxxxx> <tencent_756CDB1668EC804906FB9672@xxxxxx> <20151021071331.GD19199@dastard> |
|
Hi, Dave, Thank you very much. I got some results: # xfs_db -xr /dev/sda4 xfs_db> convert agno 1 agino 78272 ino 0x800131c0 (2147561920) xfs_db> inode 2147561920 xfs_db> p core.magic = 0x494e core.mode = 0100600 core.version = 2 core.format = 2 (extents) core.nlinkv2 = 0 core.> core.projid_lo = 26286 core.projid_hi = 0 core.uid = 30000 core.gid = 100 core.flushiter = 30 core.atime.sec = Tue Oct 20 13:51:58 2015 core.atime.nsec = 104938956 core.mtime.sec = Tue Oct 20 13:53:58 2015 core.mtime.nsec = 824941455 core.ctime.sec = Tue Oct 20 14:21:59 2015 core.ctime.nsec = 062660227 core.size = 41041920 core.nblocks = 10020 core.extsize = 0 core.nextents = 2 core.naextents = 0 core.forkoff = 0 core.aformat = 2 (extents) core.dmevmask = 0 core.dmstate = 0 core.newrtbm = 0 core.prealloc = 0 core.realtime = 0 core.immutable = 0 core.append = 0 core.sync = 0 core.noatime = 0 core.nodump = 0 core.rtinherit = 0 core.projinherit = 1 core.nosymlinks = 0 core.extsz = 0 core.extszinherit = 0 core.nodefrag = 0 core.filestream = 0 core.gen = 1194777008 next_unlinked = 75712 u.bmx[0-1] = [startoff,startblock,blockcount,extentflag] 0:[0,135330882,32,0] 1:[32,146117410,9988,0] However, I want to ask how this situation to happen? From the output, we can see "core.nlinkv2 = 0". But I can't reapper this: # dd if=/dev/zero of=/data/test.data bs=4k count=1024 1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 4194304 bytes (4.2 MB) copied, 0.00476946 s, 879 MB/s # stat /data/test.data File: `/data/test.data' Size: 4194304 Blocks: 8192 IO Block: 4096 regular file Device: 804h/2052d Inode: 29409295 Links: 1 Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root) Access: 2015-10-21 16:05:45.201679018 +0800 Modify: 2015-10-21 16:05:45.205679018 +0800 Change: 2015-10-21 16:05:45.205679018 +0800 # xfs_db -xr -c 'inode 29409295' -c p /dev/sda4 core.magic = 0x494e core.mode = 0100644 core.version = 2 core.format = 2 (extents) core.nlinkv2 = 1 core.>
core.projid_lo = 0 core.projid_hi = 0 core.uid = 0 core.gid = 0 core.flushiter = 12 core.atime.sec = Wed Oct 21 16:05:45 2015 core.atime.nsec = 201679018 core.mtime.sec = Wed Oct 21 16:05:45 2015 core.mtime.nsec = 205679018 core.ctime.sec = Wed Oct 21 16:05:45 2015 core.ctime.nsec = 205679018 core.size = 4194304 core.nblocks = 1024 core.extsize = 0 core.nextents = 1 core.naextents = 0 core.forkoff = 0 core.aformat = 2 (extents) core.dmevmask = 0 core.dmstate = 0 core.newrtbm = 0 core.prealloc = 0 core.realtime = 0 core.immutable = 0 core.append = 0 core.sync = 0 core.noatime = 0 core.nodump = 0 core.rtinherit = 0 core.projinherit = 0 core.nosymlinks = 0 core.extsz = 0 core.extszinherit = 0 core.nodefrag = 0 core.filestream = 0 core.gen = 3722739155 next_unlinked = null u.bmx[0] = [startoff,startblock,blockcount,extentflag] 0:[0,5943235,1024,0] # tail -f /data/test.data & [1] 27598 # unlink /data/test.data # xfs_db -xr -c 'inode 29409295' -c p /dev/sda4 core.magic = 0x494e core.mode = 0100644 core.version = 2 core.format = 2 (extents) core.nlinkv2 = 1 core.> core.projid_lo = 0 core.projid_hi = 0 core.uid = 0 core.gid = 0 core.flushiter = 12 core.atime.sec = Wed Oct 21 16:05:45 2015 core.atime.nsec = 201679018 core.mtime.sec = Wed Oct 21 16:05:45 2015 core.mtime.nsec = 205679018 core.ctime.sec = Wed Oct 21 16:05:45 2015 core.ctime.nsec = 205679018 core.size = 4194304 core.nblocks = 1024 core.extsize = 0 core.nextents = 1 core.naextents = 0 core.forkoff = 0 core.aformat = 2 (extents) core.dmevmask = 0 core.dmstate = 0 core.newrtbm = 0 core.prealloc = 0 core.realtime = 0 core.immutable = 0 core.append = 0 core.sync = 0 core.noatime = 0 core.nodump = 0 core.rtinherit = 0 core.projinherit = 0 core.nosymlinks = 0 core.extsz = 0 core.extszinherit = 0 core.nodefrag = 0 core.filestream = 0 core.gen = 3722739155 next_unlinked = null u.bmx[0] = [startoff,startblock,blockcount,extentflag] 0:[0,5943235,1024,0] As we can see, core.nlinkv2 is still "1" after I unlink /data/test.data. Thanks, Ye ------------------ Original ------------------ From: "Dave Chinner";<david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, Oct 21, 2015 03:13 PM To: "YeYin"<eyniy@xxxxxx>; Cc: "Eric Sandeen"<sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; "xfs"<xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Subject: Re: du result is smaller than xfs_quota report > > Is anything mounted under that directory hierarchy, and hiding files from du's view? > > > No, Thanks. I found some unlinked inodes, but I can't get some useful information: > > > # xfs_db -xr -c 'agi 1' -c p /dev/sda4 .... > unlinked[0-63] = 0:78272 .... > # xfs_db -xr -c 'inode 78272' -c p /dev/sda4 That's because 78272 isn't an real inode number. It's a AG relative inode number ("agino") of 78272. The global inode number folds in the AG number to it, and this is from AG 1. So: xfs_db> convert agno 1 agino 78272 ino <inum> xfs_db> inode <inum> xfs_db> p .... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: du result is smaller than xfs_quota report, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | very long log recovery at mount, Arkadiusz MiÅkiewicz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: du result is smaller than xfs_quota report, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: du result is smaller than xfs_quota report, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |