| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Spam on list? |
| From: | Jason White <jasonjgw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 5 Feb 2007 09:59:14 +0000 (UTC) |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702040822520.14035@p34.internal.lan> <45C62982.1090206@sandeen.net> <p73wt2wnbd2.fsf@bingen.suse.de> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Debian) |
On 2007-02-05, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> I think it may be time to revisit that decision. It's gotten really >> bad lately. I agree. > > Please don't do that. It means nothing can be cross posted > from l-k anymore, which would be pretty bad. Posting from Gmane (nntp://news.gmane.org/) is also desirable, and (relatively) safe as it implements a challenge/response procedure and has other anti-spam controls. Is it possible to configure the list server to be more selective about who can post (i.e., detecting header contents that include known good lists, Gmane postings, etc.)? There's always "greylisting", too. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Spam on list?, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE 960192 - XFS sysctl cleanup, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Spam on list?, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE 960791 - Fix assertion in xfs_attr_shortform_remove(), Lachlan McIlroy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |