| To: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC 0/3] Convert XFS inode hashes to radix trees |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 04 Oct 2006 19:59:15 +0200 |
| Cc: | xfs-dev@xxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20061003222256.GW4695059__33273.3314754025$1159914338$gmane$org@melbourne.sgi.com> |
| References: | <20061003060610.GV3024@melbourne.sgi.com> <20061003212335.GA13120@tuatara.stupidest.org> <20061003222256.GW4695059__33273.3314754025$1159914338$gmane$org@melbourne.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> writes: > > And yes, 64 bit systems are cheap, cheap, cheap so IMO this > functionality is really irrelevant moving forward. If it had come > along a couple of years ago then it would be different, but I think > mainstream technology is finally catching up with XFS so it's not a > critical issue anymore... ;) One issue is that people often still run a lot of 32bit userland even with 64bit kernels. The compat layer will just truncate the inodes I think. But so far I haven't heard of anybody complaining on x86-64. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Directories > 2GB, Dave Kleikamp |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC 0/3] Convert XFS inode hashes to radix trees, Trond Myklebust |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC 0/3] Convert XFS inode hashes to radix trees, Trond Myklebust |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC 0/3] Convert XFS inode hashes to radix trees, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |