| To: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2/9]: Reduce Log I/O latency |
| From: | Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Nov 2007 01:49:25 +0100 |
| Cc: | xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, lkml <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20071122003339.GH114266761__34694.2978365861$1195691722$gmane$org@sgi.com> (David Chinner's message of "Thu\, 22 Nov 2007 11\:33\:39 +1100") |
| References: | <20071122003339.GH114266761__34694.2978365861$1195691722$gmane$org@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> writes: > To ensure that log I/O is issued as the highest priority I/O, set > the I/O priority of the log I/O to the highest possible. This will > ensure that log I/O is not held up behind bulk data or other > metadata I/O as delaying log I/O can pause the entire transaction > subsystem. Introduce a new buffer flag to allow us to tag the log > buffers so we can discrimiate when issuing the I/O. Won't that possible disturb other RT priority users that do not need log IO (e.g. working on preallocated files)? Seems a little dangerous. I suspect you want a "higher than bulk but lower than RT" priority for this really unless there is any block RT priority task waiting for log IO (but keeping track of the later might be tricky) -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH 1/2] AIL list threading V2, David Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH 2/2] Debug - don't exhaustively check the AIL on every operation, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/9]: Reduce Log I/O latency, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/9]: Reduce Log I/O latency, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |