| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: hardware RAID sunit and swidth values? |
| From: | Robert Sander <ml-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 11 Apr 2003 21:54:40 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization: | Epigenomics AG |
| References: | <news2mail-slrnb9cnsc.156.gurubert-dated-1050042067.onpbonhn@raman.epigenomi cs.epi> <1050072633.16906.1.camel@two.nks.net> <1050073584.23735.10.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com> <1050075759.16906.48.camel@two.nks.net> <20030411162601.GA14523@pc9391.physik.uni-regensburg.de> <1050081295.16906.70.camel@two.nks.net> |
| Reply-to: | Robert Sander <gurubert-dated-1050097897.ckffphdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) |
On Fri, 11 Apr 2003 17:16:13 +0000 (UTC), Derek Glidden <dglidden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thankfully, "mkfs.xfs" with no options Just Does The Right Thing on this > machine, and sets sunit and swidth correctly when it makes the > filesystem. :) (Though it might be different with hardware RAID...) That may be the case with software RAID, where mkfs.xfs is able to get the stripe size from the md driver. But with at least our hardware RAID boxen sunit and swidth are both set to 0 (zero). My only remaining question is: Does this affect performance in any dramatic way? Greetings -- Robert Sander Manager Information Systems www.epigenomics.com Kastanienallee 24 +493024345330 10435 Berlin |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: kernal upgarde, Joshua Baker-LePain |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: hardware RAID sunit and swidth values?, Martin K. Petersen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: hardware RAID sunit and swidth values?, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: hardware RAID sunit and swidth values?, Martin K. Petersen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |