xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: redhat 7.1

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: redhat 7.1
From: Juri Haberland <list-linux.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 23:41:06 +0000 (UTC)
Distribution: local
Organization: spoiled dot org
References: <200106011732.f51HWa721084@jen.americas.sgi.com> <3B1A672C.8E98B355@gmx.de>
Reply-to: Juri Haberland <juri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (OpenBSD/2.9 (i386))
Martin Stricker <shugal@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Steve Lord wrote:
>> are compilers which are:
>> 
>> a) still the recommended kernel compiler
>> b) do not exhibit problems with xfs.
> 
> a) is true in RHL 7.0 only, because kernel 2.2.x doesn't compile with
> gcc 2.96-RH due to problems found in http://www.bero.org/gcc296.html .
> Kernel 2.4.x which is used in RHL 7.1 does compile nicely with gcc
> 2.96-RH. Therefore the old gcc is no longer called kgcc but is found in
> the package egcs-compat. But I don't know what happend if you do an
> upgrade, maybe kgcc still remains.

Well, kgcc is still called kgcc and is in the package compat-egcs.
Concerning the compile issues you mentioned I had a very interesting
expierence:
Kernel 2.4.3 and newer doesn't do the network auto media detection right 
using the 3c59x driver if compiled with gcc 2.96. If I use the kgcc from the
compat-egcs package it works without a problem.

It took me a loooong time to realize that it isn't a kernel nor a user 
issue...

Let's all say:
I will never compile my kernel with anything other than egcs!

Juri

-- 
Juri Haberland  <juri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>