| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | uname |
| From: | Thomas Graichen <news-innominate.list.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 30 Nov 2000 15:14:29 GMT |
| Distribution: | local |
| Organization: | innominate AG, Berlin, Germany |
| Reply-to: | Thomas Graichen <graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | thomas.graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.0-XFS-test10 (i686)) |
i found the idea of the uname 2.4.0-XFS-testxy a good idea to avoid
^^^^
conflicts with other kernels - looks like it got lost in the -test11
update - maybe we can put it back as default?
t
--
thomas.graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
technical director innominate AG
clustering & security the linux architects
tel: +49-30-308806-13 fax: -77 http://www.innominate.com
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: resizing xfs, Thomas Graichen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: uname, Seth Mos |
| Previous by Thread: | Patch for XFS on LVM and MD (RAID), danscox |
| Next by Thread: | Re: uname, Seth Mos |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |