| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | xfs on notebooks (noflushd etc.) |
| From: | thomas graichen <list-linux.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 15 Jul 2001 18:51:02 +0200 |
| Distribution: | local |
| Organization: | spoiled dot org |
| Reply-to: | thomas graichen <tgr@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | thomas graichen <tgr@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.6-pre7-xfs (i686)) |
just out of curiousity: how does xfs interact with things like noflushd which reduce the disk flushing for more effective ide poweroff possibilities ... is the flushing below the fs layer so that it should all work transparently or may it result in problems with xfs (or journaling fs in general)? a lot of thanks in advance t -- thomas graichen <tgr@xxxxxxxxxxx> ... perfection is reached, not when there is no longer anything to add, but when there is no longer anything to take away. --- antoine de saint-exupery |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfsdump on alpha, Ivan Rayner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Re: mounting XFS fails, Gerwin Brill |
| Previous by Thread: | Lost data on XFS, David Lukaštík |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs on notebooks (noflushd etc.), Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |