xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: New tarball error

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: New tarball error
From: Vincent Bernat <bernat@xxxxxxx>
Date: 15 Aug 2001 09:48:25 +0200
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20010815114548.G302907@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
References: <000001c1242c$b968d220$650aa8c0@vauntmure.com> <m3lmkm7hh3.fsf@neo.loria> <20010815114548.G302907@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence)
OoO En ce milieu de nuit étoilée du mercredi 15 août 2001, vers 03:45,
Nathan Scott disait:

>> I have just compiled latest tarballs and found some glitches (I have
>> never compiled earlier tarballs, so it may be "normal") :
>> - in my system, libtool is
>> /usr/local/libexec/rep/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libtool and not
>> /usr/bin/libtool. I have never seen any program who have complained
>> about this.

> That's a strange place for libtool.  I have checked only
> Debian and Redhat, but they both install it in /usr/bin.

I have a SuSE (6.2, 6.3 or 6.4, I can't remember) and I think it is
the default place since I didn't recompiled libtool.

> I think /usr/bin is also only a backup if it can't be found
> on your path, this is from configure.in:

> dnl ensure libtool is installed
> AC_PATH_PROG(LIBTOOL, libtool,,/usr/bin)
> if test "$LIBTOOL" = ""; then
>         echo
>         echo 'FATAL ERROR: libtool does not seem to be installed.'
>         echo $pkg_name cannot be built without a working libtool installation.
>         exit 1
> fi
> libtool=$LIBTOOL
> AC_SUBST(libtool)

> Is this the error you're running into?  The fourth parameter
> should be just a fallback path in case its not found anywhere
> else, IIRC.

Since I thought that I didn't have libtool, I have downloaded it,
compiled and installed. It has ended in /usr/local/bin. I have types
"rehash" and relaunched configure and got the same error. Then, I have
checked the script and make a symlink to help him find it.

If I remove the symlink, I get :

neo bernat/xfsprogs-1.3.4> which libtool
/usr/local/bin/libtool
neo bernat/xfsprogs-1.3.4> ./configure
creating cache ./config.cache
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler (gcc  ) works... yes
checking whether the C compiler (gcc  ) is a cross-compiler... no
checking whether we are using GNU C... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for make... /usr/bin/make
checking for ld... /usr/bin/ld
checking for tar... /bin/tar
checking for gzip... /usr/bin/gzip
checking for rpm... /bin/rpm
checking for makedepend... /usr/X11R6/bin/makedepend
checking whether ln -s works... yes
checking for awk... /usr/bin/awk
checking for sed... /usr/bin/sed
checking for echo... /bin/echo
checking for libtool... no

FATAL ERROR: libtool does not seem to be installed.
xfsprogs cannot be built without a working libtool installation.
neo bernat/xfsprogs-1.3.4> libtool --version
ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.4 (1.920 2001/04/24 23:26:18)

> Files required by system software using the Data Management API
> (DMAPI).  This is used to implement the interface defined in the
> X/Open document:  Systems Management: Data Storage Managment
> (XDSM) API dated February 1997.  This interface is implemented
> by the libdm library.

OK, but for a end user, it is useful ? Or in other words, is it useful
just for certain programs (databases ?) which will then explicitely
use it (and so, there is no advantage to use dmapi without one of
these programs) ?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>