| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: devfsd-1.3.11-1 |
| From: | Thierry Vignaud <tvignaud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 02 May 2001 21:03:08 +0200 |
| Cc: | Alan Eldridge <alane@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3AEF8B8E.E6E3ED9E@sgi.com> |
| Organization: | MandrakeSoft |
| References: | <20010502000814.A16705@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> <3AEF8B8E.E6E3ED9E@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.95 |
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> writes: > > So, order notwithstanding, if you've got, e.g., > > > > REGISTER ^cdroms/cdrom.$ EXECUTE /bin/ln -s $devpath $mntpath > > REGISTER ^cdroms/cdrom0$ EXECUTE /bin/ln -s $devname cdrom > > > > only one of those two things is going to happen (I think the latter). This > > kinda sucks, especially for the exact case I used. > > Interesting, I'll have to look at this. The fact that there is a > keyword: > > IGNORE This action causes all subsequent processing for > the device to be ignored. > > for devfsd.conf made me think that the default was to continue on, > processing each match...? i'll look at it |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: devfsd-1.3.11-1, Thierry Vignaud |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS for Linux 2.4.4 query, Russell Cattelan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: devfsd-1.3.11-1, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: devfsd-1.3.11-1, Austin Gonyou |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |