| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Meaning of effective permissions |
| From: | "Brett I. Holcomb" <brettholcomb@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 19 Apr 2003 02:00:07 -0400 |
| In-reply-to: | <20030418073548.GC4576@plato.local.lan> |
| Organization: | Holcomb & Associates |
| References: | <web-519153@rems07.cluster1.charter.net> <20030418073548.GC4576@plato.local.lan> |
| Reply-to: | brettholcomb@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
So what is the purpose of granting someone, say user A rwx permissons if the mask will only allow r---? I thought the ACL entry would override the mask. > On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 09:26:05AM -0400, brett holcomb wrote: > > What is the meaning of the effective permissions printed > > by getfacl? > > its showing you what the permissions will really be. > > usually this occurs because the mask provides fewer permissions then > the access control entry your looking at. > > so if you have an acl giving `luser' rw- permissions to a file, but > the mask is r-- `luser' will only have r-- access to the file. no one > may have more permissions then granted by the mask. -- Brett I. Holcomb AKA Grunt <>< |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Not copying all files, Brett I. Holcomb |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Not copying all files, Brett I. Holcomb |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Meaning of effective permissions, Ethan Benson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Meaning of effective permissions, Ethan Benson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |