| To: | XFS mailing list <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: What's up with this list? |
| From: | "Carlos E. R." <carlos.e.r@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 19 Sep 2015 02:30:42 +0200 (CEST) |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=MYoki1Mf9aLtmZZ7yN92CcesX5OGgM4JZWkcEEpdZyw=; b=DajAKyKDTa+QaOKCpdo3lOkiWv/Y9f4D1odkEA6QAmBagcBPIz7xS5ubalhG1y3twd oyZXyqfV45N9euKZeFSMWCrJMRKvAzSvdMhoux4k6otrUnznt5RWqGA7kc0RkdWx7Vrb 2mGa6g0VrVfU4Qf9z8Rs2oUtZZcs4DFKtdakQ+ZS6MT9I3GuaCJ32oW71D9trqxciglF 2lgweZOU5fr6JrXKxBdKw3OqDkkVYXE37BVS5wmGCAU9ip5+1L725+9XvrgfBQcdqxOq W2BslFuaFuNJuS4U0pp/U/KTa3aGN5WicDK7iT0/f3u3uf49SacrecvJmXUN+pQzfx4W vRUQ== |
| In-reply-to: | <20150918225624.GF26895@dastard> |
| References: | <alpine.LSU.2.11.1409181438290.6675@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <541AFB60.5030403@xxxxxxx> <alpine.LSU.2.11.1509161436390.25528@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55FAF053.3020405@xxxxxxx> <55FB06E8.1020203@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <55FC3569.5020801@xxxxxxx> <20150918225624.GF26895@dastard> |
| Sender: | Carlos Robinson <robin.listas@xxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Alpine 2.11 (LSU 23 2013-08-11) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 El 2015-09-19 a las 08:56 +1000, Dave Chinner escribiÃ: On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:01:45AM -0500, Troy McCorkell wrote:xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx is an open list and does not require people to be members of the list to post to it. The spam filters applied to xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx are as aggressive as they can be and still allow for an open list. Next option would be to add a moderator to the list. Adding a moderator would interfere with non-list members posting to the list.Moderation is not an option because of this interference and the burden it puts on the moderator to respond in a timely fashion. There is no need to go to extreme measures; I think it is easier than that. I do not have access to the oss.sgi.com logs, but surely the admins can, and find out what were the posts that bounced and for what reason. My guess is that they were sent from an invalid domain (no dns), or no reverse dns, or something like that (not content analysis, that comes once the mail is accepted and stored). Surely a filter for those is simple enough to implement, and should not harm other participants. - -- Cheers
Carlos E. R.
(from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" (Minas Tirith))
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iF4EAREIAAYFAlX8rMEACgkQja8UbcUWM1zCvQD8ChIl3emugmUA3OzXZNlbDb+a
RHppXrwnmLVMwmhRXXAA/RwwQZn/di5yKZZQFDwhFsEnALkmeycPdKNhGHRXLePN
=Y84u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: xfsxyncd in 'D' state, Earl, Joshua P |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: What's up with this list?, Fanael Linithien |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: What's up with this list?, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: What's up with this list?, Carlos E. R. |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |