| To: | Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan: Do not block forever atshrink_inactive_list(). |
| From: | David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 3 Jun 2014 14:43:22 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | Motohiro.Kosaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, riel@xxxxxxxxxx, kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx, kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=55XL2FyS/3CnWBbS19BbAcN0SP0TlWG96DuZ8t0FVzQ=; b=ZbKJmFRaiBNnZF3x5JoC2sX0uUVsxNdHNh7/RiKAkSGBQo21+3LKyduwM1QzhRBAHx D2qrOg0nH2ld0EZ9mM6xhMg8AJj9lGYATfVnURkRCTo9l+agHLWJQXkhaOYZVC8TgNZG 67d62+3Oc2m19HyrP5Wc9MwALc4IL6MSh3xDrU9q5fcMvo34+kJWkt7ubi1GUm3Om0xv kvmi3EH+S5KCU/W0QULcrkaCY9ehpdexWWzzYGRJbzzQ878C31ZZFCTgHFUTmrYFoGw5 Mm73Cc7963o7U/57rG/rA6HOVKZXj0WWDC5xwG1U0mpxe9buzxyHaSGd5vWcFojmpCRp sz0A== |
| In-reply-to: | <201405262045.CDG95893.HLFFOSFMQOVOJt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20140520004449.GE18954@dastard> <20140519225915.3370328d.akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140520063024.GH18954@dastard> <201405202358.ADF10119.SMOFOQLFtOVHJF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6B2BA408B38BA1478B473C31C3D2074E31D59D8673@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201405262045.CDG95893.HLFFOSFMQOVOJt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) |
On Mon, 26 May 2014, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> In shrink_inactive_list(), we do not insert delay at
>
> if (!sc->hibernation_mode && !current_is_kswapd())
> wait_iff_congested(zone, BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
>
> if sc->hibernation_mode != 0.
> Follow the same reason, we should not insert delay at
>
> while (unlikely(too_many_isolated(zone, file, sc))) {
> congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
>
> /* We are about to die and free our memory. Return now. */
> if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
> return SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX;
> }
>
> if sc->hibernation_mode != 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 32c661d..89c42ca 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1362,6 +1362,9 @@ static int too_many_isolated(struct zone *zone, int
> file,
> if (current_is_kswapd())
> return 0;
>
> + if (sc->hibernation_mode)
> + return 0;
> +
> if (!global_reclaim(sc))
> return 0;
>
This isn't the only too_many_isolated() functions that do a delay, how is
the too_many_isolated() in mm/compaction.c different?
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC 00/32] making inode time stamps y2038 ready, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS filesystem claims to be mounted after a disconnect, Martin Papik |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] xfs/013: allow non-write fsstress operations in background workload, Brian Foster |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan: Do not block forever at shrink_inactive_list()., Tetsuo Handa |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |