| To: | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: splice vs execve lockdep trace. |
| From: | Vince Weaver <vince@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:59:35 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <CA+55aFxiGXht8+Dox=C2ezYYf1yMaLAzMYr40j=+peP8j5Ha6w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20130716015305.GB30569@xxxxxxxxxx> <CA+55aFyLbqJp0-=7=HOF9sKGOHwsa7A7-V76b8tbsnra8Z2=-w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130716023847.GA31481@xxxxxxxxxx> <CA+55aFxiGXht8+Dox=C2ezYYf1yMaLAzMYr40j=+peP8j5Ha6w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) |
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Interestingly, the 'soft lockups' I was > > seeing all the time on that box seem to have gone into hiding. > > Honestly, I'm somewhat inclined to blame the whole perf situation, and > saying that we hopefully got that fixed. In between the silly do_div() > buglets and all the indications that the time was spent in nmi > handlers, I'd be willing to just ignore them as false positives > brought on by the whole switch to the perf irq.. Did the perf soft lockups go away with 3.11-rc1? 734df5ab549ca44f40de0f07af1c8803856dfb18 finally got committed, and it fixes a major long-standing perf-related NMI soft lockup bug I found when fuzzing. Vince |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: splice vs execve lockdep trace., Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: splice vs execve lockdep trace., Dave Jones |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: splice vs execve lockdep trace., Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: splice vs execve lockdep trace., Dave Jones |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |