| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.39-rc4+: oom-killer busy killing tasks |
| From: | Christian Kujau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:19:24 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <alpine.DEB.2.01.1104242245090.18728@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <alpine.DEB.2.01.1104211841510.18728@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110424234655.GC12436@dastard> <alpine.DEB.2.01.1104242245090.18728@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Alpine 2.01 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) |
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 at 09:46, Dave Chinner wrote:
> I'd say they are not being reclaimmmed because the VFS hasn't let go
> of them yet. Can you also dump /proc/sys/fs/{dentry,inode}-state so
> we can see if the VFS has released the inodes such that they can be
> reclaimed by XFS?
Please see http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.39-rc4/oom/
- slabinfo-4.txt.bz2, contains /proc/sys/fs/{dentry,inode}-state and
/proc/fs/xfs/stat (is this interesting at all?) and a few other
/proc outputs
- messages-4.txt, contains the syslog from this run.
Should I enable a few more DEBUG_* options in the kernel? Which options
would be helpful?
Thanks for looking into it,
Christian.
--
BOFH excuse #194:
We only support a 1200 bps connection.
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.6.39-rc4+: oom-killer busy killing tasks, Christian Kujau |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.6.39-rc4+: oom-killer busy killing tasks, Christian Kujau |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.39-rc4+: oom-killer busy killing tasks, Christian Kujau |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6.39-rc4+: oom-killer busy killing tasks, Christian Kujau |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |