| To: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes? |
| From: | Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:29:26 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20101223195544.53d45f0b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012221128440.5245@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101222175611.1c7d5190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D124B71.9030401@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20101223012655.2681c596@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012221928050.7452@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101223005630.GJ4907@dastard> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012230442150.7452@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012231304130.12482@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101223195544.53d45f0b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) |
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010, Emmanuel Florac wrote: Le Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:06:10 -0500 (EST) vous écriviez:http://home.comcast.net/~jpiszcz/20101223/final.html Please check the updated page: http://home.comcast.net/~jpiszcz/20101223/final.html Using a partition shows a slight degredation in the re-write speed but an increase in performance for sequential output and input with the mode set to perform. Looks like this is what I will be using as it is the fastest speeds overall except for the rewrite. Thanks! Justin. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfssyncd and disk spin down, Stan Hoeppner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: able to mount a fs, unable to repair it, laurent+xfs |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes?, Justin Piszcz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes?, Stan Hoeppner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |