| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Help with XFS |
| From: | Robert Brockway <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:14:38 -0400 (EDT) |
| In-reply-to: | <20100618144821.0cab4bd4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <OF4967B99D.609CC213-ONC1257745.0048E646-C1257745.004919A3@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100618132108.790921cf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <OF450B8187.BD5256B0-ONC1257746.003E79FF-C1257746.003EE62C@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100618133458.6640ce96@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <OF0E234D8E.F048FF4D-ONC1257746.003FC10E-C1257746.00407333@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100618140028.05650928@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <OF77BEDC85.715D16D2-ONC1257746.0043A985-C1257746.0044BAFC@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100618144821.0cab4bd4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) |
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010, Emmanuel Florac wrote: Le Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:30:43 +0200 Thomas Førde <thomas.forde@xxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait:ill see if we can rebuild a different SAN with mirror functionalityt, y have 384x300GB disk in my SAN, so it should be possible.No, a mirror will corrupt your data as well, a simple copy is better; Exactly. High availability and backups are two different things, although people often confuse them. Here are my notes from my backup talk: http://www.timetraveller.org/talks/backup_talk.pdfThis approach is honed over many years, having done many disaster recoveries in the real world. Cheers, Rob -- Email: robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Linux counter ID #16440 IRC: Solver (OFTC & Freenode) Web: http://www.practicalsysadmin.com Open Source: The revolution that silently changed the world |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Help with XFS, Emmanuel Florac |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove xfs_iput_new, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Help with XFS, Emmanuel Florac |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Help with XFS, Stan Hoeppner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |