| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Big filesystem > (4TiB) recommendations (mkfs parameter tuning?) |
| From: | Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:53:38 -0500 (EST) |
| User-agent: | Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) |
|
Often, on this list, there are issues where there is not enough memory,
etc, to repair a large filesystem. If one is going to create a 10-16TiB filesystem (for example), should one use the mkfs.xfs defaults, or should there be special tuning for filesystems of this size, so they will be less susceptible to failure for one reason or another? Justin. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 12x performance drop on md/linux+sw raid1 due to barriers [xfs], Peter Grandi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Big filesystem > (4TiB) recommendations (mkfs parameter tuning?), Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 9/13] fs/xfs: Remove redundant test, Julia Lawall |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Big filesystem > (4TiB) recommendations (mkfs parameter tuning?), Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |