| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | XFS: "slow at directory traversal .. after 3 years of use" |
| From: | Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 6 Oct 2008 16:30:22 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | Lennart Hansen <lahansen@xxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1c08324d0810061325kdd1453alb9eab9ceb769b1cf@mail.gmail.com> |
| References: | <1c08324d0810061325kdd1453alb9eab9ceb769b1cf@mail.gmail.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) |
Someone pointed me to the following paper: http://www.stdlib.net/~colmmacc/Apachecon-EU2005/scaling-apache-handout.pdf Which states: After nearly 3 years of use, some problems with XFS became noticeable. As the number of used inodes in the filesystem grows XFS becomes very slow at directory traversal. Although this did not impede web-serving it did have a heavy impact on how quickly we could synchronise content with the primary sources. Dave / Eric, comments here? Does ext3 suffer from the same problem? Have these issues been fixed since 2005? Would inode64 alleviate some of these problems? Justin. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] remove exports of inline functions, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS Regression Issue in kernel 2.6.26.3, Albert Graham |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] remove exports of inline functions, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS: "slow at directory traversal .. after 3 years of use", Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |