xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Internal error xfs_trans_cancel

To: Daniel Wagner <wagi@xxxxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Internal error xfs_trans_cancel
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 14:16:19 +0200
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <a933729c-afa8-3cc1-6fe4-5f49b9629326@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <ab487269-a423-e3dc-6f59-3dda004960c3@xxxxxxxxx> <20160601071047.GJ12670@dastard> <e80cee4f-1789-5418-ffa8-7551138bda0a@xxxxxxxxx> <0644b434-6cea-4188-9702-469c26d191b8@xxxxxxxxx> <20160602002653.GL12670@dastard> <af997005-e144-5509-885c-a688562ea3ec@xxxxxxxxx> <20160602063539.GM12670@dastard> <a933729c-afa8-3cc1-6fe4-5f49b9629326@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
On 02.06.2016 15:29, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> Hmmm, Ok. I've been running the lockperf test and kernel builds all
>> day on a filesystem that is identical in shape and size to yours
>> (i.e. xfs_info output is the same) but I haven't reproduced it yet.
> I don't know if that is important: I run the lockperf test and after
> they have finished I do a kernel build.
> 
>> Is it possible to get a metadump image of your filesystem to see if
>> I can reproduce it on that?
> Sure, see private mail.

Dave, Daniel, what's the latest status on this issue? It made it to my
list of know 4.7 regressions after Christoph suggested it should be
listed. But this thread looks stalled, as afaics nothing happened for
three weeks apart from Josh (added to CC) mentioning he also saw it. Or
is this discussed elsewhere? Or fixed already?

Sincerely, your regression tracker for Linux 4.7 (http://bit.ly/28JRmJo)
 Thorsten

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>