| To: | Lachlan McIlroy <lmcilroy@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.30-06725: xfs_fsr: Assertion failed: ip->i_delayed_blks == 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 5991 |
| From: | Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:51:32 +0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qKfKsivS3SOS//ZFG08XHcZK/8Xyrb/Mxrdxw5NnG4k=; b=DHeWnLFIc//wm1NT0ZORFnnALdh7xD1vSfvWhnWz0vLNANEok4lX8823ZOdnQIZS1U RZJJ03HFMcsRyWpQxLiAW3Yh0PO0gnoCubQ9+oI+n3sTf/IvKbPiHkpV5yRrgqM73QlE dr6O59EvktOJNu9RvSU4zPW1FDXOH8lERsN7E= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=WSuMUUok0xqvQ8vTebj9ijEIEZE594NgzCLuYNLrZvqOwO2DB47AX8kO7q5wNBKfs2 vArXMricuBqR3Kkz7cQLVw5SoTZSH6W7gerhQZqgIH25LYx7uulK7w8dSQMtOml+jw7R rQHOvlE2t9AEVDDWwnMFYzXonzC3buE4FytkM= |
| In-reply-to: | <961884583.292281245481464174.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <941396568.292261245481145500.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <961884583.292281245481464174.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
2009/6/20 Lachlan McIlroy <lmcilroy@xxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi Alexander, > > I've seen this assertion before and if it's the problem I think it > is then it should be fixed with this patch: > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00176.html > > It shouldn't be difficult to test this too - If you run about 1024 > dd writers to separate 100MB files and then run xfs_bmap on each > file afterwards it should assert. > Still the same problem with this patch, it does not work for me. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: implement ->dirty_inode callout, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: inconsistent lock state on 2.6.30?, Sage Weil |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.30-06725: xfs_fsr: Assertion failed: ip->i_delayed_blks == 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 5991, Alexander Beregalov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6.30-06725: xfs_fsr: Assertion failed: ip->i_delayed_blks == 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 5991, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |