| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.30-rc4: xfs_fsr hangs |
| From: | Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 5 May 2009 12:54:05 +0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=R3YB81S4KZpg9t/5dEfbm1HOS0DXbRwpz0r9yM6DiTY=; b=FRLbEMHo37Qom27O5VxexM9I1fiUHpoo+s59U4/iB0QRCma6OPp85H7YryK58qBTDd fFRpHVvkKqAq7Fjf76sqQBTrAbPhAFb9Vo5Dr7TbLAsBDrOLSTqB0e+/b8Iy9ULWdl8l uXQUSw4YY0yi+WJ/Qq8irCxXM10+3ou9eJEMQ= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=RnzGCRC5S48GfMtd7U/aRTdO7UjtIMiRDTZLnQUUlhypLYxh2mTbmPJgzyAkdWC/pm c6BsT1J0IjeNj7uv3Y8HylAyuQew6iwL16LGeJW+//DDWW2E79sctLnEVyXKwRf+4U/D Wm6cfJivVgYXmlfWd1mxZRc+asbskGpEYynPw= |
| In-reply-to: | <a4423d670905031333o341981aal48168eeeb2870cdd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <a4423d670905011333s664115bdh1d72392897567c1d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090502101405.GA6145@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <a4423d670905021135s4fdbea82t20cf75b61c59dc75@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49FC9762.6010109@xxxxxxxxxxx> <a4423d670905021159k51e91b12h96189005980b5e73@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49FD2488.70503@xxxxxxxxxxx> <a4423d670905030015h59038741of55bae686ef923f0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49FDAA8E.80205@xxxxxxxxxxx> <a4423d670905031333o341981aal48168eeeb2870cdd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
2009/5/4 Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>: > 2009/5/3 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >> Alexander Beregalov wrote: >>> 2009/5/3 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >> ... >> >>>> Does this happen if you try to defrag a single file? i.e. something like: >>> Yes, it does. >> >> Oh, interesting. I didn't really expect that. The testcase I provided >> worked for me. Maybe you can provide your kernel .config and I'll try >> on a 32-bit box (I only tested 64-bit so far). > Attached. Cannot reproduce it on x86_64 as well. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | migration to selinux + xfs_fsr oddity...., Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | XFS portion that can be offloaded to hardware, Sagar Borikar |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.30-rc4: xfs_fsr hangs, Alexander Beregalov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6.30-rc4: xfs_fsr hangs, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |