| To: | Russel Ingram <ringram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option |
| From: | ivanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ivan Rayner) |
| Date: | Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:07:39 +1000 |
| Cc: | <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106100301540.8848-101000@roujin.gargoylecc.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Russel Ingram wrote: > > The argument to -b should be bytes, so 16k would be 16384 not 16. > > > > If this doesn't fix your problem, could you use -v5 to get verbose output. > > (This might produce alot of output, so you should redirect it to a file.) > > > > Ivan > > > Ok, I ran it again with the right sysntax on the -b option. Here's the > command I gave it: > > xfsdump -v5 -m -b 32k -o -F -E -l0 -M"gumby" -L"tmp" -f /dev/tape -s tmp / The argument to -b should be bytes, so 32k would be '32768' not '32k'. Let me know if this helps. Ivan -- Ivan Rayner ivanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | quota support, Chris Szilagyi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Stability of the Red Hat 7.1 + XFS system, Bryan J. Smith |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option, Russel Ingram |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option, Russel Ingram |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |