xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SGI 1200 and the scsi/apic problem

To: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: SGI 1200 and the scsi/apic problem
From: Marc Luuk <m.luuk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 11:26:03 +0100
Cc: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, Matthijs van der Klip <matthijs.van.der.klip@xxxxxx>, Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20365.1006508165@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Keith Owens wrote:

> Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 20:36:05 +1100
> From: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Matthijs van der Klip <matthijs.van.der.klip@xxxxxx>,
>      Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: SGI 1200 and the scsi/apic problem 
> 
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 10:25:11 +0100, 
> Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >At 10:09 23-11-2001 +0100, Matthijs van der Klip wrote:
> >>Several months ago I had trouble getting Release 1.0.1 to work on an SGI
> >>1200 machine. I found several references to broken firmware of the Intel
> >>440GX motherboard and a fix telling me to boot the kernel with the
> >>parameter 'apic'.
> >>
> >>Now this trick doesn't seem to work with release 1.0.2a. I get lots of
> >>scsi timeouts and can't get it to boot properly on an 1200. Does anyone
> >>have any ideas? Is the 'apic' parameter uninplemented in this new kernel?
> >>Am I convicted to use an older kernel?
> >
> >Does the system boot properly without the apic option? A lot has happend 
> >between the 1.0.1 (2.4.3 kernel) and 1.0.2 (2.4.9 kernel). It might just 
> >work now or have a workaround implemented.
> >
> >The scsi timeouts might also be related to the new style aic7xxx driver. 
> >Maybe someone from SGI which has experience with those machines can comment 
> >on this.
> 
> No, this is a generic problem with the 440GX motherboards, 1200 uses
> that m/b.  The PCI routing does not work correctly on a uni-processor
> kernel, booting with an SMP kernel or UP but using the apic table
> works.  Blame Intel for not providing info on the 440GX bugs.  RH 7.2
> install has this problem on a 1200, installing with apic worked.  I
> don;t know iof the XFS 1.0.2 installer supports the apic option or not,
> AFAIK it was a RH patch.
> 
Some hints:

At the boot prompt of the installer pass the following parameters to the
kernel:

apic noprobe

"noprobe": Installer doesn´t probe for the devices
You have do setup your devices manually. First install the module for the
SCSI-Controller: Use the new Adaptec driver! The old one doesn´t work for
the GX-Boards.
After having installed the SCSI-driver you have to install the
ethernet-device (eepro100-driver).
That´s all.

I´m using a SGI 1200 with RH 7.2 and XFS without any problems. ;-)

CU

        Marc Luuk


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>