| To: | Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ACL limit |
| From: | Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 3 Dec 2007 01:12:19 +0100 (CET) |
| Cc: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <475343FB.3060902@sgi.com> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711301902360.18767@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr> <20071202223105.GS119954183@sgi.com> <475343FB.3060902@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Dec 3 2007 10:47, Timothy Shimmin wrote: > > Yeah, it's just an array of entries in an EA value. > The EA value is limited to 64K so it's a question of how > many entries you can fit into that. > (64K - 4)/12 = 5461 > > (So just have to sort out the ondisk change as mentioned above) I'd already be happy if the ext3 ACL limit (~120) was possibe :-) The rest I can solve with groups (which is also probably faster than 1600 ACL entries). |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ACL limit, Timothy Shimmin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ACL limit, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ACL limit, Timothy Shimmin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ACL limit, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |