| To: | "Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [UNSURE] Re: mkfs options for a 16x hw raid5 and xfs (mostly large files) |
| From: | Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:37:16 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | Ralf Gross <Ralf-Lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <957634.8098.qm@web32915.mail.mud.yahoo.com> |
| References: | <957634.8098.qm@web32915.mail.mud.yahoo.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Bryan J. Smith wrote: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:So what tunables do the 9550/9650SE users utilize to achieve > 500 MiB/s write on HW RAID5/6? Do you have any type of benchmarks to similate the load you are mentioning? What did HW RAID drop to when the same test was run with SW RAID / 50 MBps under load? Did it achieve better performance due to an on-board / raid-card controller cache, or? Justin. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [UNSURE] Re: mkfs options for a 16x hw raid5 and xfs (mostly large files), Bryan J. Smith |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [UNSURE] Re: mkfs options for a 16x hw raid5 and xfs (mostly large files), Justin Piszcz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [UNSURE] Re: mkfs options for a 16x hw raid5 and xfs (mostly large files), Bryan J. Smith |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [UNSURE] Re: mkfs options for a 16x hw raid5 and xfs (mostly large files), Justin Piszcz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |