| To: | Ralf Gross <Ralf-Lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Re: mkfs options for a 16x hw raid5 and xfs (mostly large files) |
| From: | Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:59:49 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20070926165412.GE30287@p15145560.pureserver.info> |
| References: | <20070923093841.GH19983@p15145560.pureserver.info> <18166.25242.174049.175729@base.ty.sabi.co.UK> <20070926145417.GC30287@p15145560.pureserver.info> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709261227260.15219@p34.internal.lan> <20070926165412.GE30287@p15145560.pureserver.info> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Ralf Gross wrote: Justin Piszcz schrieb: Yes, I understand; what is the equivalent tweak for HW RAID? I have tried to tweak some HW RAIDS (3ware 9550SX's) with ~10 drives and one can set the read ahead for better reads but writes are still slow, that 3ware 'tuning' doc always get passed around but it never helps much at least in my testing. I wonder where the bottleneck lies. Justin. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [UNSURE] Re: mkfs options for a 16x hw raid5 and xfs (mostly large files), Ralf Gross |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: mkfs options for a 16x hw raid5 and xfs (mostly large files), Bryan J. Smith |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [UNSURE] Re: mkfs options for a 16x hw raid5 and xfs (mostly large files), Ralf Gross |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re: mkfs options for a 16x hw raid5 and xfs (mostly large files), Bryan J. Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |