| To: | Marco Berizzi <pupilla@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2980 (was Re: [<c019c63f>] xfs_bmap_search_multi_extents+0x6f/0xe0) |
| From: | Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 4 Sep 2007 09:58:34 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, mel@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <BAY103-DAV602D6B6D39BC875BBCB69B2CA0@phx.gbl> |
| References: | <BAY103-DAV11CCE8C757E221217A0176B2EA0@phx.gbl> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708030937280.17307@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <BAY103-DAV602D6B6D39BC875BBCB69B2CA0@phx.gbl> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Marco Berizzi wrote: > After a week uptime I got this error. I hope it > will be useful for you. Yes indeed but this is a different type of failure. Looks like a higher allocation failure in the networking code. Someone created objects that required an order 2 allocations that failed. > SLUB: Genslabs=22, HWalign=32, Order=0-1, MinObjects=4, CPUs=1, Nodes=1 Slub is restricted to order 0 and 1 allocs. > PREFETCH window: e5c00000-e7cfffff > NET: Registered protocol family 2 > IP route cache hash table entries: 2048 (order: 1, 8192 bytes) > TCP established hash table entries: 8192 (order: 4, 65536 bytes) > TCP bind hash table entries: 8192 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) Hmmmm. > eth2: setting full-duplex. > swapper: page allocation failure. order:2, mode:0x4020 > [<c013b21d>] __alloc_pages+0x1ed/0x2e0 > [<c014ee3b>] allocate_slab+0x4b/0x90 > [<c014eef2>] new_slab+0x32/0x150 > [<c014f47b>] __slab_alloc+0xcb/0x120 > [<c014f429>] __slab_alloc+0x79/0x120 > [<c02b0183>] tcp_collapse+0x113/0x3b0 tcp_collapse? This is due to a network configuration that required an order 2 kmalloc block. Jumbo frames? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2980 (was Re: [<c019c63f>] xfs_bmap_search_multi_extents+0x6f/0xe0), Marco Berizzi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] log replay should not overwrite newer ondisk inodes, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2980 (was Re: [<c019c63f>] xfs_bmap_search_multi_extents+0x6f/0xe0), Marco Berizzi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2980 (was Re: [<c019c63f>] xfs_bmap_search_multi_extents+0x6f/0xe0), Marco Berizzi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |