| To: | Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,zfs on software raid 5 |
| From: | Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:12:17 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | a1426z@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <E1IFb5f-00006O-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707301021090.12456@p34.internal.lan> <200707302207.02672.a1426z@gawab.com> <E1IFb5f-00006O-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Miklos Szeredi wrote: Extrapolating these %cpu number makes ZFS the fastest. This was performed on an E6300, 1 core was ZFS/FUSE (or quite a bit of it anyway) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,zfs on software raid 5, Dave Kleikamp |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Repeated XFS corruption -Corruption of in-memory data detected, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,zfs on software raid 5, Miklos Szeredi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,zfs on software raid 5, Theodore Tso |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |