| To: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Differences in mkfs.xfs and xfs_info output. |
| From: | Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 19 Feb 2008 02:20:42 +0100 (CET) |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20080219002059.GX155407@sgi.com> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802160149590.4592@alienAngel.home.sk> <20080216074019.GV155407@sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802162319300.6528@alienAngel.home.sk> <20080217230645.GY155407@sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802180015110.4514@alienAngel.home.sk> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802190044350.8907@alienAngel.home.sk> <20080219002059.GX155407@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, David Chinner wrote: > > The output I showed you was from an ia64 machine, so it's not > purely 64bit related. > > Can you rebuild you x86_64 kernel from the same kernel > tree you built the ia32 (make mrproper; make ....) and reinstall > it and see if the still exists? Done, but the problem still exists. # xfs_check /dev/loop0 sb_fdblocks 253756, counted 254780 Dave, when you tested on ia64, did you use mkfs.xfs which wrote feature2 record on right place or did you use your patch to correct feature2 on mount? Because I use mkfs.xfs patched with Eric Sandeen patch on x86_64 to create FS which really has lazy-count=1. Cheers, jan -- |
| Previous by Date: | Re: tuning, many small files, small blocksize, Timothy Shimmin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: tuning, many small files, small blocksize, Linda Walsh |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Differences in mkfs.xfs and xfs_info output., David Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Differences in mkfs.xfs and xfs_info output., David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |